Attorney for Alleged Fake Elector in Georgia Argues for Charges to be Dismissed
In a recent development in the case of alleged fake elector Craig Gillen in Georgia, his attorney is arguing for the charges to be dismissed. The attorney disputes the claim that David Shafer, the alleged victim, was not a “duly” appointed elector at the time of the incident. Gillen’s defense claims that there were no duly elected and qualified presidential electors in Georgia at that time.
Furthermore, the attorney argues that Shafer was following legal advice and attempting to comply with the law, negating any criminal intent on his part. The defense denies that Shafer acted as a “public officer” or committed forgery in signing the elector document.
Additionally, Gillen’s co-conspirators are also stated to be following legal advice as a defense in the case. This raises questions about the extent of legal culpability in this complex case.
As the legal battle continues, it remains to be seen how the court will interpret the actions of the alleged fake elector and his co-conspirators. The arguments made by the defense shed light on the nuances of the case and the intricacies of election law.
Stay tuned to The Bib Theorists for more updates on this developing story and other legal news.
“Infuriatingly humble tv expert. Friendly student. Travel fanatic. Bacon fan. Unable to type with boxing gloves on.”